Is Vidyo.ai Still Around? What Happened, and What It Costs Now

Vidyo.ai is still running, but it now operates under the name quso.ai. Existing plans and pricing carried over unchanged, and the core product is the same: upload a long video and it cuts vertical short clips with captions and a virality score. As listed on quso.ai in July 2026, there is a free tier with 75 credits per month, then Lite at $29, Essential at $39 and Growth at $49 per month, where roughly one credit equals one minute of processed video.

What happened to Vidyo.ai?

It rebranded rather than shut down. The old vidyo.ai pricing URL now redirects to quso.ai, and the pricing page carries a note aimed directly at former customers telling them their plan and pricing are unchanged after the move. Nobody was forced to migrate an account or accept a new price.

The confusing part is everything written about it before the change. A large share of the reviews, roundups and "best AI video repurposing tools" lists still ranking today describe the product as Vidyo.ai and quote a tier structure that no longer matches the live page. If you are comparing tools this month, the safest move is to ignore the numbers in those articles entirely and read the current pricing page yourself. That advice holds for every tool in this category, not just this one, because pricing in AI video moves fast.

What does quso.ai actually do?

You give it a long video, a podcast recording or a link, and it works out which segments stand alone as short clips. It cuts them to a vertical 9:16 frame, tracks the speaker so they stay in shot, burns in captions for silent viewing, and scores each clip for how likely it is to perform. You then download the clips or publish them to connected accounts.

Since the rebrand the product has widened past pure clipping into a broader social workflow, with scheduling to several platforms, AI silence removal on the higher tiers, storage and analytics. The centre of gravity is still video, though. If your weekly output includes a long recording that ought to also become five or six shorts, that is the job it does well and it does it without you opening an editor.

How much does quso.ai cost in 2026?

As published on quso.ai in July 2026:

Annual billing is listed at roughly a third less per month and doubles the credit allowance, which is a heavier discount than most tools in this bracket offer. One credit is approximately one minute of processed video, so the number that decides your plan is not how many clips you publish but how many hours of raw footage you push through the tool. A weekly hour-long podcast is about 240 minutes a month, which puts you on Essential or Growth regardless of how few clips actually make the cut.

Is the free plan enough?

Seventy-five credits a month is around an hour and a quarter of footage, capped at 720p with seven days of retention. That is genuinely enough to test the tool on a real recording rather than a demo, which is more than most competitors allow, and it is the right way to find out whether the clip selection matches your judgment before paying anyone.

It is not enough to run on. The 720p ceiling and the retention window mean it functions as an extended trial rather than a working free tier, which is a reasonable design. Test it properly, then decide.

Is quso.ai a good replacement for what Vidyo.ai did?

For the clipping job, yes, since it is the same product under a different name with more features layered on. The more useful question is whether clipping was ever the whole job.

Short clips are one output from one kind of source. They only exist if you recorded video, and they only serve the vertical feeds. The same 50 minute recording should also produce a LinkedIn post that argues its main point in text, an X thread that numbers the key takeaways, an Instagram caption, a follow-up email and a newsletter issue. None of that comes out of a clipping tool, which is why plenty of teams finish a clipping run and then sit down to write everything else by hand.

That gap is what a repurposing writer covers. An AI content repurposing tool takes the recording, the transcript, a blog post or a plain URL and rewrites the substance into channel-native posts in your voice, without producing any video at all. The two sit on different layers, and the honest comparison is laid out on the Vidyo.ai alternative page.

Should you use a clipper and a writer together?

For a video-first creator that is the setup worth building. Run each recording through the clipper for TikTok, Reels and Shorts. Paste the same recording or its transcript into the writer for the LinkedIn post, the thread, the captions, the email and the newsletter. One afternoon of recording then feeds both the video calendar and the text calendar rather than only the first.

Nothing needs integrating, because one tool takes video and returns video while the other takes a source and returns text. If the recording is a podcast episode, the mechanics of the text half are covered on the podcast to social media page, and the broader version for any video source is on repurpose video content. Clips that perform well are also the obvious raw material when you later want paid creative, and turning a proven hook into ad copy and on-brand images from a product URL is a much shorter step than starting a campaign from nothing.

How does quso.ai compare to Opus Clip?

They are direct competitors doing the same job: find the clip-worthy moments in a long video, reframe vertical, caption, score. Both meter usage, both have free entry points, and both have changed their pricing more than once in the last two years. Choosing between them comes down to which one picks better moments from your particular footage, which you can only learn by running the same recording through each free tier and comparing the output.

What neither of them does is write. That distinction is worth keeping clear when you build the stack, because it is easy to buy two clipping tools and still have nobody producing the LinkedIn posts. The same trade-off against the other main clipper is covered on the Opus Clip alternative page.

What to check before you pay

Three things decide whether any of this is worth the subscription. First, how many minutes of raw footage you actually process a month, since that is what the credit meter counts and it is usually higher than people estimate. Second, whether the clips it selects match the moments you would have chosen, which the free tier will tell you in one recording. Third, whether clips are the only output you need from that recording, or whether the posts, emails and newsletter are still landing on someone's desk afterwards.

If the answer to the third one is that the writing is still manual, the clipper is solving the smaller half of the problem. Paste one source into a tool that rewrites it for every channel and see how much of the week it covers before you add another video subscription. For the pricing of every clipper, scheduler and writer side by side, the best content repurposing tools compares the whole field with verified July 2026 figures.