Compare · Postiz
Postiz alternative, Postiz alternatives and competitors priced for 2026
Postiz is an open-source social media scheduler that also sells a hosted version, built around AI agents: every plan includes an MCP server, a CLI and a public API, so Claude, ChatGPT or any agent can schedule posts for you. Read off postiz.com on September 29, 2026, the hosted plans cost $29, $39, $49 and $99 a month for Standard, Team, Pro and Ultimate, or $23, $31, $39 and $79 a month billed yearly.
People look for a Postiz alternative for one of two reasons. Either self-hosting turned into a second job (servers, updates and a developer app approved by every social network), or the scheduler works fine and the queue is empty. The second one is what Adapter.to fixes. Paste a blog post, a YouTube video, a podcast or a URL and it writes the LinkedIn post, the X thread, the Instagram caption and the email, each shaped for its channel, ready to schedule in Postiz or anywhere else.
Paste once · adapt to every channel · in your voice
1 · Your source
1 IN ▸ 8 OUT
one source, every channel
2 · Channel-ready output
/ channels
Live, interactive · no signup needed to try
Every format rewritten natively · in your voice · your content stays yours
The short answer
Postiz is an open-source, agent-first social media scheduler with a paid hosted version, not a repurposing writer. Read off postiz.com on September 29, 2026, hosted Standard is $29 a month for 5 channels and 1 user, Team $39 for 10 channels with unlimited members, Pro $49 for 30 channels and Ultimate $99 for 100, or $23, $31, $39 and $79 a month billed yearly (about 20 percent off). Every plan has unlimited posts, a 7-day free trial, and the MCP server, CLI and API. Self-hosting is free under the AGPL-3.0 license but means running the server and getting your own app approved by each network. At 30 channels and above Postiz is one of the cheapest hosted schedulers; for 5 channels, Publer and Buffer cost less. Adapter.to turns a published article, video or podcast into a week of posts, from $29 a month.
Postiz is a scheduler: it connects your social accounts and publishes to them, from its own app or from an AI agent over MCP and API. Adapter.to is a repurposing writer: it reads a finished blog post, video, podcast or URL and produces the channel-native posts that go into any scheduler. One moves posts out the door, the other makes them, and the two sit side by side in plenty of stacks.
Side by side
Postiz vs Adapter.to, honestly
A fair look at what each does well. Both are capable tools. Here is where they differ.
| What matters | Adapter.to | Postiz |
|---|---|---|
| Core job | Writes native posts for every channel from one source | Schedules and publishes posts, from its app or from an AI agent |
| Turns a finished video, podcast or article into posts | Yes. Paste the source or a URL and get a week of posts | Partly. RSS auto-post writes a description for new feed items, and video clipping cuts YouTube videos into short clips |
| Scheduling and publishing | Not offered. It hands you text to post or schedule anywhere | Yes, to more than 25 networks including X, LinkedIn, Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, YouTube, Threads, Bluesky, Reddit and Pinterest |
| MCP server, CLI and API | Not offered | Yes, on every plan including Standard |
| Self-hosting | Not offered, hosted only | Yes, open source under AGPL-3.0 |
| AI video clipping | Not offered. It writes, it does not cut video | 60 to 600 minutes a month by plan |
| Free plan | No. Free live demo, then $29 per month | No hosted free plan. 7-day free trial, or self-host |
| Price as listed, September 29, 2026 | $29, $59 or $149 a month | $29, $39, $49 or $99 a month hosted |
| How the price is counted | By source pieces a month: 30, 120 or 400 | By connected channels: 5, 10, 30 or 100, with unlimited posts |
| Team members | 1 on Creator and Pro, 3 on Team | 1 on Standard, unlimited from Team $39 |
| Annual discount | $288, $588 or $1,488 a year | About 20 percent on every plan ($23, $31, $39, $79 a month) |
| Refund | Cancel any time, keeps access to the end of the period | Full refund of a month you paid for and did not use |
| Setup work | None. Paste a source in the browser | None hosted. Self-hosted needs a server and your own app approval per network |
| Best suited for | Producing posts from content you already made | Scheduling many channels cheaply, especially from AI agents |
Comparison reflects general, publicly understood positioning. Capabilities change, so check each product for the latest.
Competitor prices shown here were verified on their own pricing pages on the date noted.
What does Postiz actually do?
Postiz connects your social accounts and publishes to them. The channel list is unusually long: X, LinkedIn, Instagram, Facebook, Threads, Bluesky, TikTok, YouTube, Pinterest, Reddit, Telegram, Discord, Slack, Mastodon, Google Business Profile, and newer or niche destinations such as Warpcast, Nostr, Lemmy, Skool, Whop, Twitch, Kick, WordPress, Medium, Hashnode and Dev.to. Around the calendar it adds post comments and threads, repeated posts, delays between posts, "plugs" that repost or comment automatically when a post passes a threshold, customer groups for clients, analytics and RSS auto-posting.
Its pitch is agentic scheduling. Every plan, including the $29 Standard plan, ships the hosted MCP server, the Postiz CLI, the public API and webhooks, so Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor and similar agents can create and schedule posts through a chat. A Smart Agent inside the app does the same in conversation, an AI copilot drafts copy, and paid plans include AI images, AI videos and minutes of AI video clipping that cut a long YouTube video into short vertical clips.
What it does not describe is reading a finished article, podcast episode or webinar and writing the LinkedIn post, the X thread, the Instagram captions and the newsletter section that come out of it. RSS auto-post writes a description for a new blog item, which is a link post, not a week of native posts. Its agents can publish whatever you give them. Something still has to write it.
How much does Postiz cost?
We read postiz.com/pricing on September 29, 2026. The hosted plans cost $29 for Standard, $39 for Team, $49 for Pro and $99 for Ultimate on monthly billing, or $23, $31, $39 and $79 a month billed yearly. That is a discount of 20.2 to 20.7 percent, which matches the "about 20%" Postiz states. Every plan starts with a 7-day free trial, allows unlimited posts, and can be changed or cancelled at any time. If you paid for a month and did not use Postiz in it, Postiz says it refunds that month in full.
- Standard, $29. 5 channels, 1 user (no team support), AI copilot, 3 AI videos and 60 minutes of AI video clipping a month, MCP, CLI, API and webhooks.
- Team, $39. 10 channels, unlimited team members, 100 AI images, 10 AI videos and 120 clipping minutes a month.
- Pro, $49. 30 channels, unlimited team members, 300 AI images, 30 AI videos and 300 clipping minutes a month.
- Ultimate, $99. 100 channels, unlimited team members, 500 AI images, 60 AI videos and 600 clipping minutes a month.
Why people move off self-hosted Postiz
The software is free under the AGPL-3.0 license and the repository is very active, which is exactly why many teams start there. The cost shows up later. You run the server, the database and the updates, and you connect each social network through a developer app of your own. Postiz itself says getting those apps approved "can take weeks", and that Facebook, Instagram, Threads and YouTube usually take more than a month with several rounds of changes to the submission, privacy policy and terms of service. It sells app approval and server deployment as optional paid services for that reason.
Price that honestly. A developer who spends six hours a month keeping a self-hosted scheduler healthy has spent more than a year of the hosted Team plan at almost any US hourly rate. If the reason you wanted Postiz was the agent workflow, the hosted plans include it on every tier and ship agent features first, so moving to hosted Postiz is often a better answer than moving to a different tool.
The other reason is simpler. The scheduler works, the MCP server works, and the calendar is still empty on Thursday, because nothing in the stack turns last week's webinar into posts. Changing schedulers does not fix that.
Where Postiz genuinely beats the alternatives
A comparison that only lists faults helps nobody choose. Postiz wins outright in four places.
- Price per channel from 30 channels up. Pro is $1.63 a channel at 30 and Ultimate $0.99 at 100, with unlimited team members. Per-account tools like Publer cost several times that at 30 channels.
- Agent access on the cheapest plan. MCP, CLI, API and webhooks on the $29 plan, where most schedulers reserve the API for a top tier or leave it out.
- Channel breadth. More than 25 destinations, including Reddit, Discord, Telegram, Nostr, Skool and developer blogs that mainstream schedulers skip.
- Self-hosting. If you have the engineering time and a data residency reason, the open-source version is a real option that SaaS-only tools cannot offer.
What is the best Postiz alternative?
It depends on what you are leaving behind. Here is the shortlist, with prices we read off each vendor's own site in 2026.
- You are solo with a few accounts. Publer Professional is $4 an account from the third, so 5 accounts cost $20 a month against $29 on Postiz Standard. Buffer Essentials is $5 a channel, $25 for five.
- You want automation and an API without self-hosting. FeedHive Brand is $29 for 10 accounts with 5 workspaces, approvals, a REST API, a CLI and a Claude Code setup.
- You want AI writing and scheduling in one box. Ocoya Starter is $29 for 5 profiles and 300 credits, and ContentStudio Standard is $29 monthly for 5 accounts with 25,000 AI text credits and MCP access.
- You run an agency with client approvals and reports. SocialPilot Premium is $100 for 25 accounts and 6 users with client approval and white label reports.
- The queue keeps running dry. Adapter.to turns one blog post, video, podcast or URL into channel-native posts for LinkedIn, X, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, email and newsletters, and you keep Postiz to publish them.
Postiz vs Publer, FeedHive and Buffer on price
Three workloads, monthly list prices read off each vendor's own pricing page.
Solo creator, 5 accounts. Postiz Standard $29. Publer Professional $20. Buffer Essentials $25. FeedHive Creator $19, with a 30-post queue cap. At this size Postiz is the most expensive of the four; you are paying for the agent tooling.
Small brand, 10 accounts, 3 people. Postiz Team $39 with unlimited members. FeedHive Brand $29. Publer Professional $44 (10 accounts plus 2 teammates at $2). SocialPilot Standard $50. FeedHive is cheapest, Postiz close behind.
Agency, 30 accounts, 5 people. Postiz Pro $49. FeedHive Business $99, since Brand stops at 10 accounts. SocialPilot $120 (Premium plus 5 extra accounts at $4). Publer Professional $128 (30 accounts plus 4 teammates). Here Postiz is the cheapest by a wide margin; SocialPilot still wins on white label client reports.
The rule of thumb: under 10 channels, per-account tools beat Postiz on price. From 30 channels up, very little is cheaper, and the reason to look elsewhere is reporting or workflow, not cost. Our cheapest social media scheduler comparison runs more tools through the same arithmetic.
Postiz versus Adapter.to, publishing against producing
These two overlap less than it first looks, which is why the table above carries neutral crosses on eight of our rows. Postiz owns the connection to every network, the calendar, the agent access and the clipping. Adapter.to owns the step before, turning a finished piece of content into posts worth publishing.
Put a number on the half Postiz leaves to you. Turning one webinar into an X thread, a LinkedIn post, three Instagram captions, a TikTok script and a newsletter section takes about two hours by hand. Four sources a month is eight hours of writing, several times the $29 Creator plan at any realistic hourly rate, and it is the work that decides whether an agent has anything worth scheduling.
Can you use Postiz and Adapter.to together?
Yes, and if Postiz's channel breadth and agent access are why you chose it, that is the sensible setup. Write the posts in Adapter.to from the content you already publish, then paste them into the Postiz composer, or hand them to the agent you already drive Postiz with and let it schedule them.
Nothing needs integrating, because Adapter.to returns plain text. Creators who start from long videos use repurpose video content, writers use blog to social media, and teams starting from a web page use URL to social media posts. Verified pricing for every tool in the category is on the content repurposing tools comparison.
Why creators pick Adapter.to
One tool that adapts any source to every channel
Starts from your content, not a blank prompt
Postiz publishes whatever you or your agent give it. Adapter.to turns a finished blog post, video, podcast or URL into a week of channel-native posts.
Keep Postiz if you run many channels
From 30 channels up it is one of the cheapest hosted schedulers, with MCP and API on every plan. Add production instead of replacing it.
Switch if you are small or tired of servers
Under 10 channels, Publer and Buffer cost less, and hosted tools spare you the per-network app approvals self-hosting needs.
Good questions
Postiz vs Adapter.to, answered
More comparisons
See how Adapter.to compares
Planable alternative
Writes the posts your approval flow is waiting on, where Planable reviews and publishes them.
vs HootsuiteHootsuite alternative
Writes the posts from your source, where Hootsuite manages the accounts you post them to.
vs BufferBuffer alternative
Writes the posts from your source, where Buffer schedules the posts you already wrote.
vs Repurpose.ioRepurpose.io alternative
Rewrites your content natively for each channel, not just re-posts the same video.
vs CastmagicCastmagic alternative
Repurpose any source, not just audio and podcasts.
vs LatelyLately AI alternative
Every channel-native format from one source, with no voice-model training step.
vs ContentFriesContentFries alternative
Text-native formats from any source, not just video chopping.
vs Opus ClipOpus Clip alternative
Writes the copy around your video, where Opus Clip cuts the clips inside it.
vs DescriptDescript alternative
Writes the posts around your content, where Descript edits the audio and video inside it.
vs JasperJasper alternative
Repurposes the content you already made, where Jasper writes from a blank brief.
vs AuthoredUpAuthoredUp alternative
Write for every channel from a source you already made, not just format LinkedIn posts.
vs BlotatoBlotato alternative
A focused writing tool that rewrites your source in your voice, not an all-in-one posting engine.
vs PodsqueezePodsqueeze alternative
A source-agnostic writer that turns any content into channel-native posts, not a podcast-only production suite priced by the minute.
vs TajaTaja alternative
A source-agnostic writer that turns any content into channel-native posts, not a YouTube-first optimizer priced by the video.
vs Copy.aiCopy.ai alternative
A focused repurposing writer that turns one source into channel-native posts, not a go-to-market platform priced for whole sales and marketing teams.
vs CoScheduleCoSchedule alternative
A writer that turns each blog post into channel-native posts, not a marketing calendar you still have to fill.
vs ContentStudioContentStudio alternative
A repurposing writer that turns one source into channel-native posts, not a social media scheduler with AI credits bolted on.
vs OcoyaOcoya alternative
Repurposes the content you already made, where Ocoya generates fresh social posts and schedules them.
vs Predis.aiPredis.ai alternative
Rewrites the source you already have, where Predis.ai generates new carousels, videos and posts from a prompt.
vs Vidyo.aiVidyo.ai alternative
Writes every channel from any source, where Vidyo.ai (now quso.ai) cuts long video into short clips.
vs SimplifiedSimplified alternative
Rewrites content you already made, where Simplified briefs AI agents to build campaigns from scratch.
vs HypefuryHypefury alternative
Writes posts from the content you already made, where Hypefury schedules, recycles and grows an audience.
vs KlapKlap alternative
Writes every channel from one source, where Klap cuts one long video into vertical clips.
vs SubmagicSubmagic alternative
Writes every channel from one source, where Submagic captions and polishes short video.
vs TypefullyTypefully alternative
Writes every channel from a source you already made, where Typefully composes and schedules the posts you type.
vs TaplioTaplio alternative
Writes every channel from one source, where Taplio grows a single LinkedIn account.
vs Tweet HunterTweet Hunter alternative
Writes every channel from a source you already made, where Tweet Hunter grows one X account.
vs SupergrowSupergrow alternative
Writes every channel from one source, where Supergrow grows a LinkedIn presence.
vs Sprout SocialSprout Social alternative
Writes the posts from your source, where Sprout Social manages, publishes and reports on them.
vs MetricoolMetricool alternative
Writes the posts from your source, where Metricool schedules them and measures what happened.
vs LaterLater alternative
Writes the posts from your source, where Later plans them on a visual calendar and publishes them.
vs AgorapulseAgorapulse alternative
Writes the posts from your source, where Agorapulse schedules them and runs the inbox they land in.
vs LoomlyLoomly alternative
Writes the posts from your source, where Loomly plans, approves and schedules the ones you already have.
vs Vista SocialVista Social alternative
Writes the posts from your source, where Vista Social schedules them across 13 networks.
vs Zoho SocialZoho Social alternative
Writes the posts that fill each brand calendar, where Zoho Social schedules, monitors and reports on them.
vs SendibleSendible alternative
Writes the posts that fill each client workspace, where Sendible schedules, approves and reports on them.
vs PublerPubler alternative
Writes the posts that fill the queue, where Publer schedules, recycles and reports on them.
vs SocialBeeSocialBee alternative
Writes the posts that fill your categories, where SocialBee schedules and recycles them.
vs SocialPilotSocialPilot alternative
Writes the posts that fill 50 connected accounts, where SocialPilot schedules, approves and reports on them.
vs eClinchereClincher alternative
Writes the posts that fill every eClincher queue, where eClincher schedules, moderates and reports on them.
vs FeedHiveFeedHive alternative
Writes the week of posts from content you already published, where FeedHive schedules, recycles and automates them.
See how Adapter.to turns one post into every channel
One tool, any source in, every format out, each rewritten to fit the platform natively. Paste once, publish everywhere, in your voice.
Works with blog URLs, YouTube, podcasts & newsletters · in your voice · your content stays yours