Adapter.to
How it works Pricing Blog
Sign in

Compare · Postiz

Postiz alternative, Postiz alternatives and competitors priced for 2026

Postiz is an open-source social media scheduler that also sells a hosted version, built around AI agents: every plan includes an MCP server, a CLI and a public API, so Claude, ChatGPT or any agent can schedule posts for you. Read off postiz.com on September 29, 2026, the hosted plans cost $29, $39, $49 and $99 a month for Standard, Team, Pro and Ultimate, or $23, $31, $39 and $79 a month billed yearly.

People look for a Postiz alternative for one of two reasons. Either self-hosting turned into a second job (servers, updates and a developer app approved by every social network), or the scheduler works fine and the queue is empty. The second one is what Adapter.to fixes. Paste a blog post, a YouTube video, a podcast or a URL and it writes the LinkedIn post, the X thread, the Instagram caption and the email, each shaped for its channel, ready to schedule in Postiz or anywhere else.

Paste once · adapt to every channel · in your voice

Adapter Studio

1 · Your source

1 IN ▸ 8 OUT
one source, every channel

2 · Channel-ready output

/ channels

Tone

Live, interactive · no signup needed to try

1 source → 8 channels in 6s Edit · copy · post anywhere

Every format rewritten natively · in your voice · your content stays yours

The short answer

Postiz is an open-source, agent-first social media scheduler with a paid hosted version, not a repurposing writer. Read off postiz.com on September 29, 2026, hosted Standard is $29 a month for 5 channels and 1 user, Team $39 for 10 channels with unlimited members, Pro $49 for 30 channels and Ultimate $99 for 100, or $23, $31, $39 and $79 a month billed yearly (about 20 percent off). Every plan has unlimited posts, a 7-day free trial, and the MCP server, CLI and API. Self-hosting is free under the AGPL-3.0 license but means running the server and getting your own app approved by each network. At 30 channels and above Postiz is one of the cheapest hosted schedulers; for 5 channels, Publer and Buffer cost less. Adapter.to turns a published article, video or podcast into a week of posts, from $29 a month.

Startup founder reviewing a server dashboard and a draft social post side by side

Postiz is a scheduler: it connects your social accounts and publishes to them, from its own app or from an AI agent over MCP and API. Adapter.to is a repurposing writer: it reads a finished blog post, video, podcast or URL and produces the channel-native posts that go into any scheduler. One moves posts out the door, the other makes them, and the two sit side by side in plenty of stacks.

Side by side

Postiz vs Adapter.to, honestly

A fair look at what each does well. Both are capable tools. Here is where they differ.

What matters Adapter.to Postiz
Core job Writes native posts for every channel from one source Schedules and publishes posts, from its app or from an AI agent
Turns a finished video, podcast or article into posts Yes. Paste the source or a URL and get a week of posts Partly. RSS auto-post writes a description for new feed items, and video clipping cuts YouTube videos into short clips
Scheduling and publishing Not offered. It hands you text to post or schedule anywhere Yes, to more than 25 networks including X, LinkedIn, Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, YouTube, Threads, Bluesky, Reddit and Pinterest
MCP server, CLI and API Not offered Yes, on every plan including Standard
Self-hosting Not offered, hosted only Yes, open source under AGPL-3.0
AI video clipping Not offered. It writes, it does not cut video 60 to 600 minutes a month by plan
Free plan No. Free live demo, then $29 per month No hosted free plan. 7-day free trial, or self-host
Price as listed, September 29, 2026 $29, $59 or $149 a month $29, $39, $49 or $99 a month hosted
How the price is counted By source pieces a month: 30, 120 or 400 By connected channels: 5, 10, 30 or 100, with unlimited posts
Team members 1 on Creator and Pro, 3 on Team 1 on Standard, unlimited from Team $39
Annual discount $288, $588 or $1,488 a year About 20 percent on every plan ($23, $31, $39, $79 a month)
Refund Cancel any time, keeps access to the end of the period Full refund of a month you paid for and did not use
Setup work None. Paste a source in the browser None hosted. Self-hosted needs a server and your own app approval per network
Best suited for Producing posts from content you already made Scheduling many channels cheaply, especially from AI agents

Comparison reflects general, publicly understood positioning. Capabilities change, so check each product for the latest.

Competitor prices shown here were verified on their own pricing pages on the date noted.

What does Postiz actually do?

Postiz connects your social accounts and publishes to them. The channel list is unusually long: X, LinkedIn, Instagram, Facebook, Threads, Bluesky, TikTok, YouTube, Pinterest, Reddit, Telegram, Discord, Slack, Mastodon, Google Business Profile, and newer or niche destinations such as Warpcast, Nostr, Lemmy, Skool, Whop, Twitch, Kick, WordPress, Medium, Hashnode and Dev.to. Around the calendar it adds post comments and threads, repeated posts, delays between posts, "plugs" that repost or comment automatically when a post passes a threshold, customer groups for clients, analytics and RSS auto-posting.

Its pitch is agentic scheduling. Every plan, including the $29 Standard plan, ships the hosted MCP server, the Postiz CLI, the public API and webhooks, so Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor and similar agents can create and schedule posts through a chat. A Smart Agent inside the app does the same in conversation, an AI copilot drafts copy, and paid plans include AI images, AI videos and minutes of AI video clipping that cut a long YouTube video into short vertical clips.

What it does not describe is reading a finished article, podcast episode or webinar and writing the LinkedIn post, the X thread, the Instagram captions and the newsletter section that come out of it. RSS auto-post writes a description for a new blog item, which is a link post, not a week of native posts. Its agents can publish whatever you give them. Something still has to write it.

How much does Postiz cost?

We read postiz.com/pricing on September 29, 2026. The hosted plans cost $29 for Standard, $39 for Team, $49 for Pro and $99 for Ultimate on monthly billing, or $23, $31, $39 and $79 a month billed yearly. That is a discount of 20.2 to 20.7 percent, which matches the "about 20%" Postiz states. Every plan starts with a 7-day free trial, allows unlimited posts, and can be changed or cancelled at any time. If you paid for a month and did not use Postiz in it, Postiz says it refunds that month in full.

  • Standard, $29. 5 channels, 1 user (no team support), AI copilot, 3 AI videos and 60 minutes of AI video clipping a month, MCP, CLI, API and webhooks.
  • Team, $39. 10 channels, unlimited team members, 100 AI images, 10 AI videos and 120 clipping minutes a month.
  • Pro, $49. 30 channels, unlimited team members, 300 AI images, 30 AI videos and 300 clipping minutes a month.
  • Ultimate, $99. 100 channels, unlimited team members, 500 AI images, 60 AI videos and 600 clipping minutes a month.

Why people move off self-hosted Postiz

The software is free under the AGPL-3.0 license and the repository is very active, which is exactly why many teams start there. The cost shows up later. You run the server, the database and the updates, and you connect each social network through a developer app of your own. Postiz itself says getting those apps approved "can take weeks", and that Facebook, Instagram, Threads and YouTube usually take more than a month with several rounds of changes to the submission, privacy policy and terms of service. It sells app approval and server deployment as optional paid services for that reason.

Price that honestly. A developer who spends six hours a month keeping a self-hosted scheduler healthy has spent more than a year of the hosted Team plan at almost any US hourly rate. If the reason you wanted Postiz was the agent workflow, the hosted plans include it on every tier and ship agent features first, so moving to hosted Postiz is often a better answer than moving to a different tool.

The other reason is simpler. The scheduler works, the MCP server works, and the calendar is still empty on Thursday, because nothing in the stack turns last week's webinar into posts. Changing schedulers does not fix that.

Where Postiz genuinely beats the alternatives

A comparison that only lists faults helps nobody choose. Postiz wins outright in four places.

  • Price per channel from 30 channels up. Pro is $1.63 a channel at 30 and Ultimate $0.99 at 100, with unlimited team members. Per-account tools like Publer cost several times that at 30 channels.
  • Agent access on the cheapest plan. MCP, CLI, API and webhooks on the $29 plan, where most schedulers reserve the API for a top tier or leave it out.
  • Channel breadth. More than 25 destinations, including Reddit, Discord, Telegram, Nostr, Skool and developer blogs that mainstream schedulers skip.
  • Self-hosting. If you have the engineering time and a data residency reason, the open-source version is a real option that SaaS-only tools cannot offer.

What is the best Postiz alternative?

It depends on what you are leaving behind. Here is the shortlist, with prices we read off each vendor's own site in 2026.

  • You are solo with a few accounts. Publer Professional is $4 an account from the third, so 5 accounts cost $20 a month against $29 on Postiz Standard. Buffer Essentials is $5 a channel, $25 for five.
  • You want automation and an API without self-hosting. FeedHive Brand is $29 for 10 accounts with 5 workspaces, approvals, a REST API, a CLI and a Claude Code setup.
  • You want AI writing and scheduling in one box. Ocoya Starter is $29 for 5 profiles and 300 credits, and ContentStudio Standard is $29 monthly for 5 accounts with 25,000 AI text credits and MCP access.
  • You run an agency with client approvals and reports. SocialPilot Premium is $100 for 25 accounts and 6 users with client approval and white label reports.
  • The queue keeps running dry. Adapter.to turns one blog post, video, podcast or URL into channel-native posts for LinkedIn, X, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, email and newsletters, and you keep Postiz to publish them.

Postiz vs Publer, FeedHive and Buffer on price

Three workloads, monthly list prices read off each vendor's own pricing page.

Solo creator, 5 accounts. Postiz Standard $29. Publer Professional $20. Buffer Essentials $25. FeedHive Creator $19, with a 30-post queue cap. At this size Postiz is the most expensive of the four; you are paying for the agent tooling.

Small brand, 10 accounts, 3 people. Postiz Team $39 with unlimited members. FeedHive Brand $29. Publer Professional $44 (10 accounts plus 2 teammates at $2). SocialPilot Standard $50. FeedHive is cheapest, Postiz close behind.

Agency, 30 accounts, 5 people. Postiz Pro $49. FeedHive Business $99, since Brand stops at 10 accounts. SocialPilot $120 (Premium plus 5 extra accounts at $4). Publer Professional $128 (30 accounts plus 4 teammates). Here Postiz is the cheapest by a wide margin; SocialPilot still wins on white label client reports.

The rule of thumb: under 10 channels, per-account tools beat Postiz on price. From 30 channels up, very little is cheaper, and the reason to look elsewhere is reporting or workflow, not cost. Our cheapest social media scheduler comparison runs more tools through the same arithmetic.

Postiz versus Adapter.to, publishing against producing

These two overlap less than it first looks, which is why the table above carries neutral crosses on eight of our rows. Postiz owns the connection to every network, the calendar, the agent access and the clipping. Adapter.to owns the step before, turning a finished piece of content into posts worth publishing.

Put a number on the half Postiz leaves to you. Turning one webinar into an X thread, a LinkedIn post, three Instagram captions, a TikTok script and a newsletter section takes about two hours by hand. Four sources a month is eight hours of writing, several times the $29 Creator plan at any realistic hourly rate, and it is the work that decides whether an agent has anything worth scheduling.

Can you use Postiz and Adapter.to together?

Yes, and if Postiz's channel breadth and agent access are why you chose it, that is the sensible setup. Write the posts in Adapter.to from the content you already publish, then paste them into the Postiz composer, or hand them to the agent you already drive Postiz with and let it schedule them.

Nothing needs integrating, because Adapter.to returns plain text. Creators who start from long videos use repurpose video content, writers use blog to social media, and teams starting from a web page use URL to social media posts. Verified pricing for every tool in the category is on the content repurposing tools comparison.

Why creators pick Adapter.to

One tool that adapts any source to every channel

Starts from your content, not a blank prompt

Postiz publishes whatever you or your agent give it. Adapter.to turns a finished blog post, video, podcast or URL into a week of channel-native posts.

Keep Postiz if you run many channels

From 30 channels up it is one of the cheapest hosted schedulers, with MCP and API on every plan. Add production instead of replacing it.

Switch if you are small or tired of servers

Under 10 channels, Publer and Buffer cost less, and hosted tools spare you the per-network app approvals self-hosting needs.

Good questions

Postiz vs Adapter.to, answered

It is if what you are missing is the content, not the scheduling. Postiz schedules and publishes posts, from its app or from an AI agent. Adapter.to writes the posts from a blog post, video, podcast or URL you already have, from $29 a month. Many teams keep Postiz for publishing and add Adapter.to for production.
Read off postiz.com on September 29, 2026: hosted Standard is $29 a month for 5 channels, Team $39 for 10, Pro $49 for 30 and Ultimate $99 for 100, or $23, $31, $39 and $79 a month billed yearly. Every plan has unlimited posts and a 7-day free trial.
The self-hosted version is free and open source under the AGPL-3.0 license, but you pay for the server and do the maintenance and per-network app approvals yourself. The hosted version has no free plan, only a 7-day free trial, then from $29 a month.
For 5 accounts, Publer Professional ($20) and Buffer Essentials ($25) cost less than Postiz Standard ($29). For 10 accounts, FeedHive Brand is $29 against Postiz Team at $39. From 30 channels up, very little is cheaper than Postiz.
Mixpost is the usual choice for teams that want to keep self-hosting, since it is sold as a one-time license you run on your own server: $299 for Pro or $1,199 for Enterprise on mixpost.app in September 2026, with a year of updates included. If self-hosting is the problem rather than Postiz, the hosted Postiz plans remove the server and app approval work while keeping the same features.
Yes. Every Postiz plan includes a hosted MCP server, a CLI and a public API, so Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor and other AI agents can create and schedule posts. There is no separate agent tier.
Publer and Buffer for low-cost per-account scheduling, FeedHive for automation with an API, Mixpost for self-hosting, Ocoya and ContentStudio for AI plus scheduling, and SocialPilot for agencies. For writing the posts from existing content rather than publishing them, Adapter.to.
No. Adapter.to writes the content and returns finished text; it does not connect social accounts or publish. You schedule its output in Postiz or any other tool, which is why the two pair rather than compete.

More comparisons

See how Adapter.to compares

vs Planable

Planable alternative

Writes the posts your approval flow is waiting on, where Planable reviews and publishes them.

vs Hootsuite

Hootsuite alternative

Writes the posts from your source, where Hootsuite manages the accounts you post them to.

vs Buffer

Buffer alternative

Writes the posts from your source, where Buffer schedules the posts you already wrote.

vs Repurpose.io

Repurpose.io alternative

Rewrites your content natively for each channel, not just re-posts the same video.

vs Castmagic

Castmagic alternative

Repurpose any source, not just audio and podcasts.

vs Lately

Lately AI alternative

Every channel-native format from one source, with no voice-model training step.

vs ContentFries

ContentFries alternative

Text-native formats from any source, not just video chopping.

vs Opus Clip

Opus Clip alternative

Writes the copy around your video, where Opus Clip cuts the clips inside it.

vs Descript

Descript alternative

Writes the posts around your content, where Descript edits the audio and video inside it.

vs Jasper

Jasper alternative

Repurposes the content you already made, where Jasper writes from a blank brief.

vs AuthoredUp

AuthoredUp alternative

Write for every channel from a source you already made, not just format LinkedIn posts.

vs Blotato

Blotato alternative

A focused writing tool that rewrites your source in your voice, not an all-in-one posting engine.

vs Podsqueeze

Podsqueeze alternative

A source-agnostic writer that turns any content into channel-native posts, not a podcast-only production suite priced by the minute.

vs Taja

Taja alternative

A source-agnostic writer that turns any content into channel-native posts, not a YouTube-first optimizer priced by the video.

vs Copy.ai

Copy.ai alternative

A focused repurposing writer that turns one source into channel-native posts, not a go-to-market platform priced for whole sales and marketing teams.

vs CoSchedule

CoSchedule alternative

A writer that turns each blog post into channel-native posts, not a marketing calendar you still have to fill.

vs ContentStudio

ContentStudio alternative

A repurposing writer that turns one source into channel-native posts, not a social media scheduler with AI credits bolted on.

vs Ocoya

Ocoya alternative

Repurposes the content you already made, where Ocoya generates fresh social posts and schedules them.

vs Predis.ai

Predis.ai alternative

Rewrites the source you already have, where Predis.ai generates new carousels, videos and posts from a prompt.

vs Vidyo.ai

Vidyo.ai alternative

Writes every channel from any source, where Vidyo.ai (now quso.ai) cuts long video into short clips.

vs Simplified

Simplified alternative

Rewrites content you already made, where Simplified briefs AI agents to build campaigns from scratch.

vs Hypefury

Hypefury alternative

Writes posts from the content you already made, where Hypefury schedules, recycles and grows an audience.

vs Klap

Klap alternative

Writes every channel from one source, where Klap cuts one long video into vertical clips.

vs Submagic

Submagic alternative

Writes every channel from one source, where Submagic captions and polishes short video.

vs Typefully

Typefully alternative

Writes every channel from a source you already made, where Typefully composes and schedules the posts you type.

vs Taplio

Taplio alternative

Writes every channel from one source, where Taplio grows a single LinkedIn account.

vs Tweet Hunter

Tweet Hunter alternative

Writes every channel from a source you already made, where Tweet Hunter grows one X account.

vs Supergrow

Supergrow alternative

Writes every channel from one source, where Supergrow grows a LinkedIn presence.

vs Sprout Social

Sprout Social alternative

Writes the posts from your source, where Sprout Social manages, publishes and reports on them.

vs Metricool

Metricool alternative

Writes the posts from your source, where Metricool schedules them and measures what happened.

vs Later

Later alternative

Writes the posts from your source, where Later plans them on a visual calendar and publishes them.

vs Agorapulse

Agorapulse alternative

Writes the posts from your source, where Agorapulse schedules them and runs the inbox they land in.

vs Loomly

Loomly alternative

Writes the posts from your source, where Loomly plans, approves and schedules the ones you already have.

vs Vista Social

Vista Social alternative

Writes the posts from your source, where Vista Social schedules them across 13 networks.

vs Zoho Social

Zoho Social alternative

Writes the posts that fill each brand calendar, where Zoho Social schedules, monitors and reports on them.

vs Sendible

Sendible alternative

Writes the posts that fill each client workspace, where Sendible schedules, approves and reports on them.

vs Publer

Publer alternative

Writes the posts that fill the queue, where Publer schedules, recycles and reports on them.

vs SocialBee

SocialBee alternative

Writes the posts that fill your categories, where SocialBee schedules and recycles them.

vs SocialPilot

SocialPilot alternative

Writes the posts that fill 50 connected accounts, where SocialPilot schedules, approves and reports on them.

vs eClincher

eClincher alternative

Writes the posts that fill every eClincher queue, where eClincher schedules, moderates and reports on them.

vs FeedHive

FeedHive alternative

Writes the week of posts from content you already published, where FeedHive schedules, recycles and automates them.

See how Adapter.to turns one post into every channel

One tool, any source in, every format out, each rewritten to fit the platform natively. Paste once, publish everywhere, in your voice.

See pricing

Works with blog URLs, YouTube, podcasts & newsletters · in your voice · your content stays yours