Ocoya Pricing 2026, Starter $29, Team $79 and Agency $199

How much does Ocoya cost?

Read off ocoya.com/pricing on September 21, 2026, Ocoya costs $29 a month for Starter, $79 for Team and $199 for Agency, or $290, $790 and $1,990 a year if you pay annually. Every plan comes with a 7-day free trial and there is no permanent free plan. Those three tiers are the whole published lineup; there is no fourth plan and no contact-sales rung on the pricing page.

If that does not match what you have read elsewhere, that is expected. Ocoya has changed its lineup and almost every comparison page still describes the old one.

The prices most roundups still quote are retired

Ocoya used to sell four tiers with metal names. Search for its pricing today and you will still be told it runs Bronze, Silver, Gold and Diamond, usually at $19, $49, $99 and $199. That lineup no longer exists. The live page sells three tiers named Starter, Team and Agency, and the entry price is $29.

Three things changed at once, and each one breaks a claim you will find on page one of the search results.

The direction of those changes is worth sitting with. The entry plan got 53 percent more expensive and three times more generous on credits at the same time. That is not a price rise so much as a repositioning: Ocoya stopped selling a cheap starter tier and started selling a usable one.

What do the Ocoya plans include?

Each tier scales on three things at once: how many people can log in, how many social profiles you can connect, and how many AI credits the account can spend in a month. Whichever you exhaust first decides your plan.

Ocoya describes credits as its global usage unit, spent across AI captions, AI images, automations and agents, and the allowance resets every month. Brands are the isolation layer: each client or project gets its own identity, profiles and content, but the credit pool is shared across the whole account rather than split per brand.

Is Ocoya's annual discount actually two months free?

Yes, exactly, on all three tiers, which is rarer than it sounds. The billing toggle is labelled "Yearly (2 months free)" and the arithmetic holds precisely: $290 is ten times $29, $790 is ten times $79 and $1,990 is ten times $199. You pay for ten months and get twelve, which is a 16.67 percent saving.

That matters because it is almost the only vendor in this category we have priced where the annual badge is exact across every tier. Zoho Social's "save 33%" is exact on one tier of five. Planable's "2 months free" holds on one of the four things it sells. ContentStudio's "up to 34%" applies to its cheapest plan and drops to about 29 percent on the two an agency would buy. Ocoya's claim is simply true. It also means the widely repeated "20 to 30 percent off annually" is wrong by a wide margin, and wrong in the direction that flatters Ocoya.

What does an Ocoya profile actually cost?

Divide price by allowance and the ladder is unusually consistent. Starter works out at $5.80 per social profile a month, Team at $3.95 and Agency at $1.99. Every step up is cheaper per profile than the one below it.

That sounds obvious but it is not how this category usually behaves. When we costed SocialPilot the same way, value peaked on the second rung and then got worse, so the cheapest cost per account was in the middle of the ladder rather than at the top. Ocoya has no such dip, which makes sizing simple: if you will genuinely use the profiles, moving up always improves the unit rate.

Credits tell the same story more sharply. Starter buys about 10.3 credits per dollar, Team about 19.0 and Agency about 25.1. A Starter subscriber pays roughly two and a half times more per credit than an Agency subscriber. So the entry plan is the worst value per unit on both meters at once, which is the usual shape of a plan designed to move you upward.

Which limit will you hit first on Ocoya?

On Starter, the credits, and it is not close. Five profiles is a reasonable allowance for one person, but 300 credits has to cover captions, images, automation runs and agents for the whole month across all five. Spread evenly that is 60 credits per profile, and anything image-heavy consumes them faster than text does.

On Team and Agency the balance shifts. Team's 1,500 credits against 20 profiles is 75 per profile, and Agency's 5,000 against 100 is 50, so an agency running many client accounts at low volume each will feel the profile cap before the credit pool. The practical rule is that solo users are credit-limited and agencies are profile-limited, and those are different buying decisions.

The jumps between tiers are steep in price and steeper in allowance. Starter to Team is 172 percent more money for 300 percent more profiles and 400 percent more credits. Team to Agency is 152 percent more money for 400 percent more profiles. There is nothing in between, so if you need seven profiles you are paying for twenty.

Is there a free Ocoya plan?

No. Ocoya runs a 7-day free trial with no credit card required on every plan, and when it ends you pick a paid tier or lose access. There is no permanent free tier, and any review that mentions one is describing a version of the product that is no longer sold.

Seven days is enough to judge it properly if you arrive ready. Connect the accounts you actually manage, generate a real week of content rather than a few test posts, and watch the credit counter. The number that matters is how much of the 300 you burned getting through one normal week.

How does Ocoya compare with ContentStudio?

They are close rivals and the cheaper one flips twice as you scale, which you would not guess from the plan names. Both were priced first-hand on the same day.

Ocoya owns the middle of the range because Team gives 20 profiles and 5 users for $79, and ContentStudio has nothing between 10 accounts and its 25-account Agency tier. Despite its name, Agency Unlimited caps accounts at 25 and charges $5 down to $1 for each one above that, so at 100 profiles Ocoya's Agency plan is far cheaper. An earlier version of this table had ContentStudio winning the top row; we had read its Agency plan as unlimited accounts, which it is not. The tie at the bottom is only on the sticker: the two meter AI completely differently, with Ocoya pooling 300 mixed credits and ContentStudio splitting 25,000 text credits from separate image and video pools. The full breakdown is in what ContentStudio costs.

What does Ocoya actually do for the money?

Ocoya bundles three jobs that many teams buy separately. It generates social posts and captions from a prompt or a product. It designs the accompanying graphics in a built-in editor with templates. And it schedules and publishes the finished posts to the accounts you connect. For a small team that wants to write, design and publish in one window, that consolidation is the value, and it is fair to pay for if you use all three parts.

The question worth asking before committing is whether you use all three. If you already schedule somewhere you like, or you have a designer, or the brand kit lives in Canva, a chunk of what you are paying for is redundant. A dedicated scheduler is usually cheaper for that one job, which is the comparison to run against what Buffer costs before you pay for a suite.

Ocoya pricing against the job of repurposing

Here is the mismatch that sends people looking past Ocoya. It is built to produce net-new posts from a prompt. A lot of the best content is not new: it is sitting in a webinar you ran, an article you published or a podcast you recorded. Asking a generator to invent a fresh post from a one-line prompt throws that source away and returns something more generic than the material it should have been built from.

If your real job is repurposing rather than generating, a credit meter is the wrong unit to buy. You do not need an unbounded stream of invented posts metered by the hundred; you need the specific content you already made rewritten well for each channel. We laid that difference out in full, including where Ocoya is the stronger buy, on the Ocoya alternative page.

Adapter.to sits in that spot. It starts at $49 a month for 30 source pieces and does not meter the writing by credits, because it is not generating a feed; it is rewriting the sources you give it. You paste a blog post, a video, a podcast, a newsletter or a plain URL and it returns channel-native text: an X thread, a LinkedIn post, an Instagram caption, a TikTok script, a YouTube description, a newsletter, an email and ad copy. The source is the prompt, so there is nothing to configure. The AI social media post generator page shows what that looks like across platforms.

Which Ocoya plan should you choose?

Size on credits if you are solo and on profiles if you run client work. A single operator publishing most days should assume Starter's 300 credits will not last the month once images are involved, which makes Team at $79 the honest entry point rather than the $29 headline. That is a real jump, and it is worth testing inside the trial before you accept it.

If you run client accounts, count profiles first. Team covers 20 profiles and 5 logins for $79, which is strong value and the best-priced rung on the ladder for most small agencies. Agency at $199 only earns its place above roughly 20 profiles or when you need more than five people logged in, and at that size it is worth checking ContentStudio's uncapped tier at $139 before renewing. If you are weighing this against the wider market, our social media management software for agencies page costs the same setups across every tool we have verified. And if you are not sure a paid tool is warranted yet, whether you need a content repurposing tool works through the volume at which it starts paying for itself.